Planet-Rugby Homepage
News Teams Rugby Shop Tournaments Fixtures Opinion Fun & Downloads Off the field

Home

Free Email News

Video Highlights

Tour with Gullivers

Rugby Auctions

Spread Betting

Poker Room

Betting

Casino

Chat Forum

Contact us

Latest Poll
Which two sides will meet in the 2004/05 Zurich Premiership Final?
Wasps v Bath
10%
Wasps v Gloucester
5%
Gloucester v Bath
2%
Saints v Wasps
6%
Gloucester v Saints
77%
Votes: 2363






IRB World Sevens
News |  Fixtures & Results |  Standings |  History

New Zealand face Sevens ban

Defending champs field ineligible players

Defending champions New Zealand face a heavy fine or possible expulsion from the 2003/04 International Rugby Board's (IRB) Sevens after they fielded two players who had previously played for Samoa - making them ineligible to represent NZ.


Eric Rush: Banned from the IRB Sevens?

The New Zealand Rugby Union (NZRU) was checking up on the status of Kevin Senio and Sosene Anesi after the two players played for the New Zealand Sevens side in the Singapore leg of the series last weekend.

The two players previously played for Samoa at the Hong Kong Sevens in March 2000.

The IRB has strict ruled pertaining to players representing only one country during their career - a ruling made in an effort to keep the wealthier Unions from poaching talent from the 'smaller' Unions.

Unions who breach the rule risk a 100,000 pounds (US$183,745) mandatory fine for each case of fielding an ineligible player, plus possible suspension from IRB competitions.

If a ban were imposed on the New Zealand Sevens side it would be a disaster for the squad who are currently leading the '03/04 series.

The IRB would be hard-pressed to impose the full extent of the ruling, however, after Russia were disqualified from the 2003 Rugby World Cup because they fielded three ineligible South African players.

Failure to use the full extent of the law on New Zealand would undoubtedly fuel the debate made by 'smaller' Unions that the IRB favours the more prominent and wealthier Unions.

A spokesman for the NZRU was not prepared to comment on the two Samoans in the Sevens side but claimed the two had an IRB dispensation to play for New Zealand.

Ironically the issue comes just a day after the 16-nation Pacific Forum summit that has made a political issue of the way in which Australia and New Zealand plunder Pacific Island rugby talent.

The Forum is discussing ways with the IRB in which Pacific players can switch nationality when the dominant Union, such as Australia or New Zealand, does not need them.

Meanwhile, a senior rugby official reportedly revealed that there was no way possible for the NZRU to claim any dispensation for the two players.

"It is impossible because the IRB tightened up the rules before they [Anesi and Senio] played for Samoa," he said. "Now they're playing for New Zealand."



Discuss on the Message Board
Mail this to a Friend Prepare article for printer




#

Part of the sportinglife.com Network

TEAMtalk.com - Bettingzone.co.uk - sportal.com - Oddschecker
Football365.com - Football365 Shop - Rivals.net - Golf365 - Cricket365
Planet Rugby - Planet F1 - MobileLounge.co.uk - Sports Broadband Service
totalbet.com - totalbet Casino - ukbetting.com - ukbetting Casino